© Reuters. Goldman Joins Wall Street Chorus Warning About Possible U.S. FX Intervention
(Bloomberg) — The buzz around possible U.S. currency intervention is growing louder as Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE:). has now weighed in on an idea that’s been making the rounds on Wall Street.
President Donald Trump’s repeated complaints out other countries’ foreign-exchange practices have “brought U.S. currency policy back into the forefront for investors,” strategist Michael Cahill wrote in a note Thursday. Against a fraught trade backdrop that’s created the perception that “anything is possible,” the risk of the U.S. acting to cheapen the dollar is climbing, he said.
The U.S. last intervened in FX markets in 2011 when it stepped in along with international peers after the yen soared in the wake of that year’s devastating earthquake in Japan. That effort buoyed the dollar. However, more analysts in recent weeks have been contemplating the wild-card notion that the U.S. could forcibly weaken the dollar. The U.S. hasn’t taken that step since 2000.
“Direct FX intervention by the U.S. is a low but rising risk,” Cahill wrote. “While this would cut against the norms of recent decades, developed-market central banks have recently used their balance sheets more actively, and FX intervention is akin to unconventional monetary policy.”
Goldman joins analysts from banks such as ING and Citigroup Inc (NYSE:). in writing on the prospect. Intervention has become a hot topic since Trump tweeted last week that Europe and China are playing a “big currency manipulation game.” He called on the U.S. to “MATCH, or continue being the dummies.”
Buoyed in part by a round of Federal Reserve rate increases, the dollar has strengthened against many of its peers. A Fed trade-weighted measure of the greenback isn’t far below the strongest since 2002, underscoring the competitive headwinds American exports face overseas. Trump has grown concerned that the currency’s strength will undermine his economic agenda, which has also fed into his criticism of the U.S. central bank.
There may be some wrinkles to consider with intervention, Cahill wrote. While the Treasury and Fed have typically contributed equal amounts in past episodes, if the Fed chooses not to participate it would “substantially limit” the potential scale, he said. Treasury’s Exchange Stabilization Fund holds roughly $22 billion in greenbacks and around $50 billion in special drawing rights that it could convert.
To be sure, even if the Treasury acted on its own, “we would expect that the symbolic importance of this step would still have a significant market-moving effect,” he wrote.
That’s not to say it’ll be easy to leave a lasting impact on a market that trades about $5 trillion daily. In past interventions, various nations’ central banks typically acted together, strengthening the signal to investors. But this time, the U.S. may find itself flying solo, especially if its efforts would work to the detriment of American allies as trade tensions simmer.
“The international community would be unlikely at this stage to coordinate with the U.S. to weaken the dollar,” Cahill said.
The market has yet to display much concern about the prospect of U.S. intervention: Global currency volatility is at a five-year low. However, the risk of Trump moving beyond words to achieve a weaker greenback would increase if the European Central Bank pursues further monetary stimulus, according to ING.
“Could frustration with the Fed prompt the President to take matters in his own hands and weaken the dollar?” ING’s Chris Turner and Francesco Pesole wrote in a note Monday. Though the U.S. last month reaffirmed a Group-of-20 commitment to refrain from competitive devaluation, “the lure of a weaker dollar to support the U.S. economy into 2020 may be too great.”
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.